Crew flying an aircraft with multiple failures would be reluctant to carry out a go-around. The human factor.
Human Factor in aviation, mindfully human
Asiana B-747 descended to 800′ on ILS but 4nm from touch down. Almost 400′ below the required profile. This is not the first.
Who was flying the ill-fated ET302 B737 Max and using which flight parameter reference? the interim investigation report fails to address these issues including key training aspects.
At 1000ft where the crew has to take a decision, what if the default mode is to call for a go-around and if parameters meet the safe criteria, the crew continue to land? Will this be a safer option than the current method which is the reverse of this?
Advertisements Can Artificial intelligence (AI) make the co-pilot’s role in the flight deck redundant? Humans are more intolerant when dealing with softwares …
Advertisements Background Startle and surprise are often cited as potentially contributing factors to aircraft incidents due to their possible negative effects on …